01 / Work wherever you want
Use the AI tool that makes sense for the task. Brainstorm in ChatGPT. Write and structure in Claude. Explore marketing ideas in Grok. Execute workflows with Manus. You don't need to change how you work.

Memrix gives your project one persistent memory layer across the AI tools you use, so you can move between them without rebuilding the context every time.
AI can propose what should be remembered. You decide what stays.
01 / The Problem
"Here is the marketing plan for the launch..."
"Based on the product requirements document..."
"Analyzing competitive landscape..."
An AI makes a reasonable recommendation based on incomplete context. It conflicts with a decision you already made somewhere else. The outputs look fine, but the project starts becoming inconsistent.
Instead of each AI tool maintaining an isolated understanding of your project, Memrix provides a shared memory layer that can be used across your entire workflow.
02 / The Insight
03 / Workflow
Use the AI tool that makes sense for the task. Brainstorm in ChatGPT. Write and structure in Claude. Explore marketing ideas in Grok. Execute workflows with Manus. You don't need to change how you work.
As your project develops, important information can become part of its persistent memory. That can include: Decisions, Goals, Constraints, Product context, Strategy, Preferences, Discoveries, and Important project knowledge.
Instead of rebuilding your project's context for every AI platform, Memrix provides a persistent project memory that can be carried across your AI workflows.
Move from one AI platform to another while keeping the project's important context available. The task changes. The AI changes. The project memory remains.
Memrix V1 is intentionally human-controlled. The system does not silently decide what should become permanent project memory. AI proposes → Human approves → Memrix remembers.
Project Goal: Optimize landing page conversion rate.
Decision: Use Tailwind CSS tokens only.
04 / State
The goal isn't to remember everything. It's to preserve what would otherwise need to be explained again.
What the project is, what it is trying to accomplish, and the context surrounding it.
Important decisions that have already been made and, where useful, the reasoning behind them.
What the project is working toward and what outcomes matter.
Requirements, limitations, rules, preferences, and boundaries that should continue to influence future work.
Important information about the product, market, users, positioning, or strategy.
Useful findings, insights, research, and knowledge uncovered while working on the project.
Important information that needs to carry forward into future AI-assisted work.
A new AI tool doesn't have the context from previous work. → You reconstruct it. → Some context is missing. → The AI starts from an incomplete understanding.
You repeatedly explain: "Here's what we're building." "Here's what we decided." "Don't change this." "Remember this constraint." The work gets slower as the project grows.
Information moves manually between: AI → notes → AI → document → AI → AI. The workflow becomes increasingly dependent on human handoffs.
A new AI receives incomplete context. → It makes a reasonable recommendation. → The recommendation conflicts with an earlier decision. → The project starts moving in multiple directions.
Project-level information that remains available across AI-assisted sessions and platforms instead of being limited to a single conversation.
Distinction
Designed primarily around information an AI platform retains about a user or their interactions.
Information available within a particular conversation or working context.
Information intentionally associated with a specific project and designed to persist as that project evolves.
Comparisons
Memrix is not trying to compete with every tool that stores information. Its focus is narrower: Persistent memory for projects working across multiple AI tools.
ChatGPT's memory can help ChatGPT retain information about a user and their interactions. Memrix is different in focus: its core purpose is to maintain project-owned memory that can be used across AI platforms, rather than keeping the project context tied primarily to one AI environment.
Claude can work with substantial conversation and project context, and context-management mechanisms help maintain usable information during AI work. Memrix addresses a different layer: keeping important project memory persistent beyond an individual AI environment so that the project can move between tools.
Notion and Obsidian are excellent systems for human-managed notes, documents, and knowledge. Memrix is different in purpose: it is designed specifically around the memory layer required for AI-assisted project continuity.
A project can already maintain its context through files such as context.md. This can work. But maintaining and transferring those files manually creates another workflow for the human to manage. Memrix aims to make project memory a dedicated product layer rather than a repeated manual handoff process.
Memrix is Memrix by Evolv Studio. Its product category is: Persistent Project Memory. Its V1 focus is: One persistent project-memory layer across multiple AI tools.
Use different AI tools for strategy, product, research, writing, and execution without constantly rebuilding the company's context.
Carry product decisions and requirements across research, planning, specification, and development.
Preserve architectural decisions, technical constraints, requirements, and project context across AI coding workflows.
Move between AI tools for research, strategy, copy, content, and execution without repeatedly rebuilding the brand and campaign context.
Keep important findings, assumptions, decisions, and evolving knowledge available across AI-assisted research workflows.
Create a shared memory layer for projects increasingly distributed across multiple AI tools.
Why Now
The old question
"Which AI should I use?"
The new question
"Which AI should I use for this task?"
Different models and products have different strengths. You may prefer one for reasoning, another for writing, another for research, and another for execution.
Who remembers the project when the AI changes?
Memrix V1
Save target audience as: 'B2B SaaS founders scaling past $1M ARR'.
This human-in-the-loop model gives you control over what becomes persistent memory.
Establish a reliable memory layer that allows important project context to persist across AI tools.
One project. One memory.
The longer-term direction is to make that memory layer increasingly proactive.
V2 is future direction.
The Origin
We shared the problem on LinkedIn. The comments revealed that people were already building complicated workarounds to manage context across different AI sessions.
Dheeraj Sachdeva
MarTech & Operations Leader
“Coding agents always consider the codebase as the source of truth. Documentation should not just be passive docs; it should hold the project's live working state.
Hana Carqueja
Data Leader
“State, decisions and testing should all live separately. A single massive context dump doesn't scale. Different memory types need structured separation.
David Ingemar Hedin
Product Development Manager
“Continuously document manually what matters. Builders understand this, but they hate maintaining it manually. Automation should synchronize context silently.

Founder Note
I've been using AI across almost every part of the work I build.
The problem is that the work rarely stays inside one AI tool.
I might use ChatGPT to think through an idea, Claude to turn it into a PRD or make a product decision, then switch to another tool for research, marketing or execution.
The project keeps moving.
The context doesn't.
I kept finding myself copying decisions between chats, re-explaining the same project, and checking whether a new AI response still matched what we'd already decided. That's where Memrix started.
The idea is simple: the project should have a memory of its own. The AI tools can change, but the important context should stay with the project.
Memrix is now at the V1 founding tester stage.
I'm looking for people who already work across multiple AI tools to use it on real projects, challenge the assumptions, and help shape what a useful project memory layer should actually remember.
Manav Kain
Founder, Evolv Studio
Memrix is still early. We're looking for the first people who regularly work across multiple AI tools and understand how painful fragmented project context can become.
As a founding tester, you'll help answer:
One project.
One memory.
Every AI.
Memrix
by Evolv Studio